i’m sick of dana white saying the same shit after every fight: “that was amazing, i really thought it could have gone either way, we’re definitely going to look at an immediate rematch, we’re definitely going to see a third fight between these guys, how can you not when they put on such an incredible performance, blah blah blah…”
i’ve got a few hot tips for the fighting world: jones vs gustafsson didn’t need an immediate rematch — jones won. hendricks vs lawler doesn’t need a trilogy — hendricks won the first time, lawler won the second time. silva vs weidman didn’t need a rematch — weidman won. barao vs dillishaw was fucking great…but so what? it’s over, and dillishaw won in dominant fashion. move on, let barao work his way back up to a title shot, and let the next guy in line who earned it have a fucking shot at the title.
it seems like dana and whoever else calls the UFC shots are getting really fucking lazy or are trying to hype every shitty fight up to legendary statuses. it’s as if any fight that goes to decision is ‘too close to call’ in the UFC’s collective mind. well, here’s another hot tip: most fights that go to a decision fucking suck. i hate em unless both fighters are going balls out the whole time, like in the recent jones vs cormier fight. that was a good fight that ended up in a decision. BUT THAT DOESN’T MEAN THEY NEED A FUCKING REMATCH. CORMIER LOST — NEXT CONTESTANT, PLEASE.
i think i’m going to apply for a position in the UFC setting up fights. the legacy of my glorious reign will be that no two fighters will ever face each other more than once. i’ll probably wind up giving dana white stomach ulcers or a heart attack, the pudgy bastard.