Shout out to Golda on this one.
This week, I tried watching the tv series, I May Destroy You. (Side note: it’s funny I just called it a tv series when most people don’t watch scheduled tv programming anymore. I guess VOD series, or simply just ‘series’ would be more correct.) There were a few things I liked about I May Destroy You but I ended up giving up on it because I don’t like shows that are so singularly focused on topics that they just aren’t realistic. I fully agree that consent (sexual consent, in particular), the lack of it, and all the shades of grey in between, are important topics that need to be talked about in depth by everyone. However, I don’t think dedicating a tv series (there it is again…) to the topic works well, because in order to do that every character in the show needs to be having sex with different people virtually every day. Maybe some people really do live like that but I don’t know anyone who does, let alone a half dozen or more, and that makes it tough for me to swallow. In this way, it’s similar to stupid sitcoms like The Office — am I supposed to believe that none of those characters in The Office have any substantial friends or families or anything at all going on outside their zany workplace friendships and antics? It’s asinine. Likewise, am I supposed to believe that every character in IMDY has sex with different people on a daily basis, or even multiple partners on any given day? That’s absurd. Who could possibly have time for that? When do these people eat, when do they work, how do they pay rent, when do they go to the grocery store, when do they sleep? I can’t get past this.
So I stopped watching IMDY because that aspect bugged me. But another thing that bugs me, and this is obviously a bigger problem, is the weird conflict of interest I see in art addressing social issues while also seeking to be commercially successful. I know these things are far from mutually exclusive — it could certainly be argued it doesn’t matter where the conversation comes from, just as long as the conversation is being brought up, but I can’t help but question the legitimacy of the conversation when it’s rooted in Hollywood making big bucks. I mean, the reason a show like IMDY is out now is because there is a market for it, and there is money to be made off that market. I think that’s sickening, turning legitimately important topics into consumable entertainment.
Maybe I’m being too idealistic though, too pie-in-the-sky. Maybe I should look at this from the perspective of being happy that there is now a market for socially conscious shit. Yeah, the soulless shills who are eager to do whatever is necessary to profit from whatever they can are still real life vampire scum, but those people will always exist anyway so why not at least put them to use in making something that has at least some kind of a positive effect? IMDY is obviously better than more, I dunno, reality dating shows for influencers.
Ok, I talked myself off the ledge. That’s good. I still don’t like IMDY though.